Thursday, 13 February 2014

Introduction to Novel: On Henry Fielding's "Joseph Andrews"


Fielding claimed that his subject was not Men but Manners; not an individual, but a Species” (Bk. III Ch. 1). For the eighteenth century, manners meant the strategies and rules that govern all social interactions, not just rules for politeness. Choose a typical episode and discuss how Fielding portrays manners and not men.
Henry Fielding is considered one of the greatest and significant contributors to the development of the English novel. His novel Joseph Andrews is called a novel of 'manners'.  The novel, in its entirety, is an impassioned satire on the moral and social ills that beset the 18th century English society. In this novel we are confronted with a chameleon-like society that frequently changes its appearance to gratify personal lusts of various kinds. The novel depicts human beings camouflaged in various shades of vanity, hypocrisy and narcissism. Fielding's exploration begins with his survey on the nature and temperament of women of his time. Women of all classes were snobbish and amorous to some extent. 
One such episode where Fielding discusses manners, not men is the behavior of both Mrs. Slipslop and Lady Booby and their passion for Joseph Andrews, a mere footman. Lady Booby begins to show her affections for Joseph Andrews soon after Sir Thomas Booby's death, and Mrs. Slipslop indulges in providing various items of food to Joesph in order to show her feelings towards him. Although, there is a difference in the passions of both the ladies, yet both keep up appearances so as to not give away their true intentions regarding Joseph. Being involved in an affair with a footman is not the kind of scandal Lady Booby wishes to have popularized about herself. After allowing Joseph to sit on her bed, Lady Booby attempts to tempt Joseph but being naive and free of impure thoughts, Joseph fails to understand the intentions of his mistress. The discourse between the two is heard by Mrs. Slipslop, and afraid to lose her reputation Lady Booby has no choice but to adopt a softer attitude with Mrs. Slipslop. When both Mrs. Slipslop and Lady Booby discover each other's feelings for Joseph, both attempt to hide it.
She had the utmost tenderness for her reputation, as she knew on that depended many of the most valuable blessings of life; particularly cards, making curtsies in public places, and, above all, the pleasure of demolishing the reputations of others, in which innocent amusement she had an extraordinary delight. She therefore determined to submit to any insult from a servant, rather than run a risque of losing the title to so many great privileges.” (Book I, ch. IX)
Both the ladies represent the class of people who are corrupt to the core, rotten in their heart and yet both appear to be respectable women on the outside. Lady Booby is no different than many other ladies of the eighteenth century, belonging to households with respectable names and reputations, and yet their furtive actions and intentions prove otherwise. As Hamilton Macallister observes, Lady Booby may do almost anything she wants -- except marry Joseph, because to do so would be beneath her. Henry Fielding satirically uncovers the truth in the character of Lady Booby. She exemplifies the traditional flaws of the upper class, namely snobbery, egotism, and lack of restraint. So, she represents a typical “species” of that time period in her true self; a species that gives supreme importance to reputation and wealth but all the while indulges in immodest and hypocritical practices.
Fielding presents two paragons of hypocrisy in Lady Booby and her servant and imitator Mrs. Slipslop. Lady Booby dissembles her motives continually, for example in walking out with Joseph: supposedly, she sees “the Effects which Town-Air hath on the soberest Constitutions,” so she heads to Hyde Park with her handsome footman. More serious is her conduct following the death of her husband. The reader understands “disconsolate” in a sarcastic sense even before learning that Lady Booby’s visitors consoled the bereaved widow with card games and before witnessing the ease with which she rebounds and attempts to acquire a new bed-mate.
Mrs. Sliplsop takes after her mistress both in her passion for Joseph and in her attempts to appear other than she is. She embodies the traits which Fielding abhors about about the society. Her inappropriate use of language and her uncontrolled sexual impulses when combined with her undeniably misguided devotion to those of status make her the ideal comic example of society's wrongdoings. Mrs. Slipslop can be best described as pretentious. Fielding has exaggerated Slipslop's behaviour to draw attention to the sexual hypocrisy of the society's value systems. To further exaggerate the situation, Fielding makes use of the irony of women being unvirtuous. Fielding also mocks Mrs. Slipslop's misguided devotion to the class structure. The conversation between Mrs. Slipslop and Lady Booby demonstrates that Mrs. Slipslop is a person who wishes to seem educated and worthy of the acquaintance of Lady Booby.
As Fielding says through the dialogue of Lady Booby in Book III chapter VI :“And yet these we must condemn ourselves to, in order to avoid the censure of the world; to shun the contempt of others, we must ally ourselves to those we despise; we must prefer birth, title, and fortune, to real merit. It is a tyranny of custom, a tyranny we must comply with; for we people of fashion are the slaves of custom.” It clearly states that Lady Booby was keeping up an appearance of good virtue and solid reputation solely because being a person of fashon meant abiding by the customs and rules of the society.
CONCLUSION
Fielding demonstrates the underlying truth that society as a whole functions but, with a few moral changes, it would have a superior functionality. Slipslop is the perfect character in which to accomplish this great and tedious task. Her status as a waiting gentlewoman, and her closeness to her mistress make this parody seem all the more laden with ridicule and hypocrisy. Fielding's preface sums up the fact that this novel was to show the “manners” and failings of the society.
REFERENCES
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:K9Ibz5zHhGIJ:www.omdix.com/pdf/docs/study_school_1071119183.pdf+mrs+slipslop+hypocrisy&hl=en&gl=pk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiWBBJDkc3DjB3iB1OOnppQ6et8e3wwBboOPSq7r_ne0PVDNa1SlE8RfpVEZlIsZQQgvWDbQj1kuJymc5EbKfNOK_kcmJ7syKMNwvCEJ-cJRKzscIs9Bfvb3qkINcqtEgWyGrXo&sig=AHIEtbS9DkXW6Av-vznjldXHvnSF3w-BPA

-Credit Moneeza Rafiq

No comments:

Post a Comment